Author Archives: Michael Kaechele

Get Off the Path!

“Adults follow paths. Children explore. Adults are content to walk the same way, hundreds of times or thousands; perhaps it never occurs to adults to step off the paths.”

Neil Gaiman in The Ocean at the End of the Lane


What are your paths? Let me name a few that I see in education:

  • Curriculum
  • Testing and test prep
  • Standards
  • Textbooks
  • Lesson plans
  • Daily objectives
  • Common assessments
  • District pacing guides
  • Siloed subjects
  • Grade level expectations

Not saying that these are all horrible things that should totally be eliminated (although I could make a strong argument for many of them), but I think they fit Gaiman’s analogy in that adults are so locked into them. Not only are we “content to walk the same way”, but we freak out a bit inside if we are not on pace and on track. We are ready to scold kids to “get back on the path!” as soon as they venture sideways.

How much time and energy do we spend making sure that we meet all of the adult expectations of our classroom vs. meeting the needs of the children in front of us?

Now I realize that these two things are not mutually exclusive. All of the things in the list were designed with the intention of assuring high quality education for all students. But learning must be fluid and personalized for the students in front of us. There is no one golden path that leads all children to learning nirvana. Adult expectations vs. children’s needs: What is our highest priority?


Covid-19 blew up the path. Remote learning forced everyone to adapt virtually every aspect of their class. It was not done in a thoughtful approach, but out of traumatic necessity. This summer gives space to reflect. We know that online learning worked great for some kids, was pointless hoop jumping for others, and for some of our most needy students was a total failure. But if we are honest, are those results much different than in a typical classroom?

Why do children leave the path? Because they see something interesting. Isn’t that what learning is? Pursuing knowledge because we are fascinated by it. Sometimes the path is boring. Oftentimes the students have no idea where the path is going (no, writing the objective on the board doesn’t address this). Usually there are other routes to get to the same place other than the sanctioned path.

The Neil Gaiman quote reminded me of the long essay by Carol Black, A Thousand Rivers (a water theme connection?). Black argues for a return to holistic learning based on the community model of indigenous peoples. “Any Cree parent knows that you can tell when a child is ready for something because he will begin to ask questions about it. You can’t control the timing of this, and there is no reason to.”

All humans are natural learners, but schools are often so artificial.


Personally, I don’t believe that any child is lazy or lacks passion. They are just interested in different things than what is typically emphasized in schools. Kids are not interested in being “talked at.” So many times, I have seen the shift from apathy to enthusiasm, when students start talking about what they are doing outside of school. It may be sports, theatre, a club, or a hobby. They are motivated and work very hard at things that they care about. It is our job to connect their passions to learning vital skills needed in society. The first step in doing so, is to take a step back from mandated curriculum and make learning more open-ended and organic.

The opportunity before us is to reconsider schooling. The pressure of the tests was temporarily (but hopefully longer) removed. While I am a firm believer that schools alone can not fix all of societies ills, we need to do better to support all learners. For the disengaged children, what better place to start than with projects centered around them?

We need what Laureen Adams calls a “radical pedagogy of love.” This doesn’t mean that we are Kumbaya around the campfire all of the time. It does mean that we attend to the Social and Emotional well being of all of our students. I think we forget how radical love is.

Love is telling the whole truth about history including marginalized groups and oppressed peoples. Love is admitting when we are wrong as individuals or as a society. Love is making sure all kids have strong thinking skills, high reading levels, and computational fluency. Love is not soft. Love is demanding effort and excellence because we have caring relationships with kids. Love is showing students all that they can be.

Remote learning was an opportunity for children to explore their passions this spring. How can we continue to build our classes around child-centered practices? What about the kids who never engaged online? How can we create learning experiences that invite them into learning?

It’s time to let students lead us off of the path…

Questions? Interested in SEL and PBL Consulting?  Connect with me at or @mikekaechele onTwitter.

How PBL Gets All Kids in the Game

School is a game with official “rules” for how to play:

  • Show up every day.
  • Do all of your work (even if it is mindless, busy work).
  • Test well (this is the ultimate part of the game where we decide the “winners”).
  • Figure out what each teacher wants and do it (real talk).
  • Be respectful to adults (compliance over everything; this needs a long post to unpack how much is wrong with how most places define respect and how one-sided it is).

Everyone in education knows that different students approach the game of school in different ways with various levels of success. The majority of professional development is based on getting a certain segment of the school population to play the game better, aka get higher test scores.

I want to compare the way school has traditionally been “played” to varsity sports and the way that different kinds of students approach it. At the same time, I want to demonstrate how Project Based Learning (PBL), is all-inclusive, inviting every student to be actively engaged in their learning process. It’s why I believe that PBL is the best structure for education.

Varsity Athletes

Varsity Athletes are the traditional high achievers. They know the rules of school and win the game. Everyone knows who they are, not just from varsity letters and rosters (the honor roll) but by how they act in class. They pay attention, studiously take notes, and ask questions in discussions. They come to school to play and compete to be team captain or MVP. They keep track of their stats (grades) and work hard to improve their game.

Although they are over-achievers as students, varsity athletes are often ball hogs. They may struggle to work with other students and prefer to just do everything themselves. They have the highest GPA but usually lower SEL skills.

The truth is that varsity athletes will do fine in school no matter what. They have “made the team” their entire life and expect to be successful in school. If you change the rules of the school game to PBL, they will pushback the loudest at first, because they are worried about their stats (grades). PBL feels risky to have new and confusing “rules” to the game of school. But in the end, they will adjust and learn new structures and will perform just fine.

The bonus for varsity athletes (and the selling point to their concerned parents) is that through PBL they will develop the SEL skills of communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity. They will learn leadership skills through the projects and do meaningful work that looks great on a college application. In short, they will be developing the soft skills that future employers are looking for.

Team Managers

Team managers love the game. They want to be a star on the team, but just aren’t athletic enough. They are often stat nerds who collect cards and memorabilia. They are hard working and like being a part of the team.

Team managers are the type of students who work hard in school, want to be successful, but lack specific skills. They may be unorganized and never turn in their work, even if they complete it. They may actually know lots of content, but perform poorly on tests. They may struggle with a specific skill such as reading, writing, or numeracy. Some of them have official labels like 504 or special education, but others do not.

Team managers may get cut from the team because of their lack of specific athletic skills. but they have other skills like being a stat nerd. In school, managers may have hands-on expertise like working on cars or art that are often unrecognized in core classes.  PBL gives choices for learning and assessment that honors these students’ strengths. Managers have the opportunity to demonstrate their learning in a multitude of different approaches. PBL uses scaffolding to teach these students SEL skills of organization and academic skills too.


Varsity athletes are a small percentage of the school population, as most kids don’t play on a team. Non athletes are the students who hate sportsball, as they sarcastically call it. They fall into all different “categories” from geeky D&D players to music loving Goths to artsy activists. They may actually be athletic, but focus on non-varsity sports like skateboarding or dance or performing theatre.

Non athletes may attend events like football games because they are in the band, or just for the social part of hanging out. They don’t understand how to play the game of sportsball, because they have no interest in it. They are passionate about other things.

Many students are “non athletes” in the classroom. They may be forced to be there or they may enjoy the social aspects of school, but they are disconnected from learning. They may perform to a minimal standard to pass and keep their parents off their back, but given the choice they would literally rather being doing anything else.

PBL makes learning relevant to these kids. Instead of siloed content with little application, standards are addressed by authentic problems pitched by local partners in the community. Students do work that matters. Voice and choice means that teachers design projects that are both culturally responsive and connected to student passions.

Many non athletes may be developmentally behind from not “playing.” They have been going through the motions for so long that they are missing basic skills. Others may be English Learners who lack language skills. Through personalized scaffolding in PBL, all students experience engaging content while developing skills. They don’t need boring, abstract remedial lessons, but instead meaningful projects completed in community. PBL draws in students who have never wanted to “play” the game of school before.

Playground Stars

Playground stars are athletes, and they know how to play the game. They just never try out for the team. For whatever reason, they play for fun (and dominate) but don’t want to play at school. It may be that they don’t like the coach or a certain teammate. They may have to work a job or have duties at home such as babysitting younger siblings.

In school, playground stars are potential dropouts. They aren’t necessarily behind academically; they just choose not to engage. Many times they should be in gifted and talented programs (a category that I find problematic) but they rarely show their talent at school.

A playground star won’t take notes, doesn’t appear to be paying attention, and doesn’t do homework. Yet they get a B on a test without much effort (but a D in class because the teacher weighs HW and participation). Unlike the non athlete who doesn’t really understand the skills and habits to be successful in school, the playground star knows exactly what to do, but doesn’t feel like doing it.

Playground stars are like non athletes, in that, the missing factor is motivation. They think that school is a waste of time and don’t want to play. But unlike the non athlete, they don’t fake going through the motions of minimal effort. They refuse to participate. Oftentimes they become behavior problems in class. Alternative education is full of playground stars who have rejected the traditional system.

PBL reaches these kids by giving them a voice in their education. Playground stars don’t hate learning, they hate school. So give them authentic projects with meaningful outcomes. Challenge them to solve real issues in the community. Listen to what they care about and design school around that.

Playground stars need to be seen. Teachers need to get to know them, developing deep trusting relationships, before they can “coach” them to success. PBL teachers are “player’s coaches.” Relationships come first, fundamentals and the game second.


One of the challenges for schools is that most teachers were varsity starters in high school. They didn’t just make the team, they were MVP’s. School worked for them. They loved it and were successful so they went into education. So many teachers assume that there is nothing wrong with the traditional structure of school, and when kids fail it is because of their own actions or character: lazy, distracted, and unmotivated.

In fact, none of these examples of students are lazy. Non athletes and playground stars work hard in things that they care about. School rarely falls into that category. PBL changes school from a competition of winners and losers to a cooperative game where all students can “win” None of this magically happens by “doing a project.” It requires a transformation of pedagogy including assessment, grades, classroom management, and culturally responsive teaching. It’s time to level the playing field with PBL and make our classrooms places where all kids succeed.

Questions? Interested in SEL and PBL Consulting?  Connect with me at or @mikekaechele onTwitter.